.Image resolution is an umbrella term that describes the detail an image holds. The term applies to raster digital images, film images, and other types of images. Higher resolution means more image detail.
The term resolution is often used for a pixel count in digital imaging, even though American, Japanese, and international standards specify that it should not be so used, at least in the digital camera field. An image of N pixels high by M pixels wide can have any resolution less than N lines per picture height, or N TV lines. But when the pixel counts are referred to as resolution, the convention is to describe the pixel resolution with the set of two positive integer numbers, where the first number is the number of pixel columns (width) and the second is the number of pixel rows (height), for example as 640 by 480. Another popular convention is to cite resolution as the total number of pixels in the image, typically given as number of megapixels, which can be calculated by multiplying pixel columns by pixel rows and dividing by one million. Other conventions include describing pixels per length unit or pixels per area unit, such as pixels per inch or per square inch. None of these pixel resolutions are true resolutions, but they are widely referred to as such; they serve as upper bounds on image resolution.
Resolution is the number of pixels in a linear inch—pixels per inch (or PPI), but it is most commonly referred to as dots per inch (DPI). The more pixels, or “dots,” per inch, the higher your image resolution will be.
With color images, each pixel can be one of 16 million different colors. For black and white images, there are 256 gradations of gray pixels ranging from black to white: 0 (black) through 255 (white). More pixels means higher resolution, which creates better image quality because you end up with more realistic representations of color, better gradations of both individual colors and gray tones, and crisper images in general.
Descriptive metadata describes a resource for purposes such as discovery and identification. I think it is important to have technical and descriptive metadata as it serves purposes such as data browing, data transfer and data documentation. Important software, equipment and material for different imaging requirements could be cameras such as digital or film. software would include vector and bitmap editing programs. The reasons for using different file formats for images is because they all offer different advantages. Examples are JPEGs have compressed file formats so small file sizes. Tiffs offer uncompressed file format so a larger file size and higher quality images.
When talking to parties about image editing workflow and procedures you want to include image management and oranganisation sofwate such as for stacking images. Procedures would include checking image sharpness, checking and possibly adjusting image levels such as brightness, adjusting colours, cropping and saving the image in the correct format. When selecting the most suitable hardware and software for image editing, you need to look at what offers the most in what your paying for. I would personally for hardware choose a PC due to experience. In software, you want to be looking at what system it can be used on e.g Mac or PC, features and capabilities in the program in which others cant offer and also the price you are paying for the software.
When talking to parties about image editing workflow and procedures you want to include image management and oranganisation sofwate such as for stacking images. Procedures would include checking image sharpness, checking and possibly adjusting image levels such as brightness, adjusting colours, cropping and saving the image in the correct format. When selecting the most suitable hardware and software for image editing, you need to look at what offers the most in what your paying for. I would personally for hardware choose a PC due to experience. In software, you want to be looking at what system it can be used on e.g Mac or PC, features and capabilities in the program in which others cant offer and also the price you are paying for the software.
Under law, it is the photographer who will own copyright on any photos he/she has taken, with the following exceptions:
If the photographer is an employee of the company the photos are taken for, or is an employee of a company instructed to take the photos, the photographer will be acting on behalf of his/her employer, and the company the photographer works for will own the copyright. If there is an agreement that assigns copyright to another party.
In all other cases, the photographer will retain the copyright, if the photographer has been paid for his work, the payment will be for the photographer’s time and typically an allocated number of prints. The copyright to the photos will remain with the photographer, and therefore any reproduction without permission would be an infringement of copyright.
Examples:
- If Bill Smith asks Peter Jones the photographer to photograph his wedding. Peter Jones will normally provide a single copy of the prints as part of the fee, but any additional prints Bill or his family and friend want must be ordered via Peter as he is the copyright owner and controls who can copy his work.
- If Bill Smith engages the services of XYZ-Photos for the same job, and Peter is an employee of XYZ-Photo who instruct Peter to take the photos, XYZ-Photos will be the copyright owner and control how they are used.
The purpose of registration is to ensure that you have proper, independently verifiable, evidence of your work. This ensures that if another party steals your photos you have solid evidence to prove your claim.
Without registration it can be very difficult, and often impossible, to prove your ownership if another person claims the photo belong to them.
As with all copyright work, you should first obtain permission from the copyright owner before you use someone else’s work.You should also be prepared to pay a fee, as many photographers will charge you for using their work.
Only the copyright owner, (or his/her authorised representative), can give permission, so you should contact the photographer, or his/her company, directly for consent. For images published on the Internet, it is typical to contact the webmaster of the site in the first instance, unless the site provides contact details for the owner of the images.
The copyright owner has no obligation to allow you to use their work, and can refuse permission for any reason.
No comments:
Post a Comment